![]() Thus, applying a critical discourse studies analysis, the aim was to capture the character of the so far under-researched privacy in Polish media discourse. Considering the post-communist past that shapes a specific approach to surveillance and the general polarisation of polish media discourse, one would expect the key role of privacy issues in the public sphere. Moreover, we seek whether a specific norm of data-related privacy could be defined/redefined within the discourse. ![]() ![]() In the analysis, we draw on theoretical approaches that understand privacy as having four dimensions: Relational, participatory, contextual, and technological. In this article we look at the Polish media discourse on privacy. Firstly, users need to be educated on the subject, and after that, it is necessary to analyse which instruments to use to try to avoid data collection as much as possible and to learn how to use the greedy data platforms intelligently. Moreover, because it is a relatively new phenomenon, and having little research in the area, thinking about defence against surveillance capitalism is not an easy thing. In addition, technical and behavioural defence methods against surveillance capitalism will be addressed. This research question will be analysed by using respected studies in the area, researching available information, and thorough investigation on the tactics and methods used by different entities for data collection. This research analyses the use of our data, methods used for data collection and surveillance, the risks related to such practices, and how to defend ourselves against such threats. However, only now that studies began to appear on the subject and laws began to develop against such practices. As Zuboff (2019a) analysed, this data collection started to be used when the big companies understood the value they would have and such practices have been carried out for a long time. The pirate activities of digital giants are becoming a part of reality, and in the conditions of the growing indifference of society, it is quite difficult for advocates of privacy to act. There is a great debate to try to understand where our data goes, the extent to which big techs have the right to use our data, and what are the dangers of not caring about the collection of our data. In a world of surveillance capitalism, the user's data becomes a highly valuable asset, and the user becomes the "raw material" for behavioural data for various companies, governments, and even individuals. ![]() The results of the study, calculated by statistical methods, showed that although the majority of respondents had average knowledge and attitudes about surveillance capitalism, which may result from insufficient knowledge of the subject matter, this participation in specialized activities/workshops influences the level of intensification of online institutional privacy protection practices. ![]() The study was conducted on a sample of 177 adolescents in Poland. The aim of the study was to verify whether knowledge, and what kind of knowledge, on surveillance capitalism translates into practices related to the protection of online institutional privacy. The dominant role in surveillance capitalism is played by hi-tech corporations. Surveillance capitalism has emerged as a result of internet users’ activities and involves the collection of all data about these users by different entities for specific benefits without letting them know about it. P>The purpose of the study was to determine the level of knowledge and attitudes towards surveillance capitalism and online institutional privacy protection practices among adolescents in Poland (aged 18–19), as well as to determine the relationships between these variables. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |