![]() ![]() This can be worked out as it's now by default a bit more black-ish and later it's getting back to the user preffered theme.Dark mode may look better, but not everyone prefers using it. When it can call it's simpler, seperate style settings instead. No need to call for the Dark Reader settings in itself for performance issues. Whenever user modified, updated Dark Reader's default text color and background color Update the white flash style, whenever Dark Reader's default settings gets modified. For a closer, much smoother transition to the real Dark Reader theme, few seconds later. We try to prevent this with injecting ASAP an Style that prevents this. The white flash is rather an behavior that's happening when a browsers switches to another website and the render engine renders a white blank page between the removing of all elements of the old website and loading the new website. This is not the biggest rendering bug right now on the Dark Reader of course, but it will enhances trust of the user to the inversion process of the extension, when it's filtering experience / transition is as smooth and consistent as ever.īetter inversion rendering experience = better webpage experience = better extension experience ![]() No need to call for the Dark Reader settings in itself for performance issues.it carries over and modifies to the white flash style immediately.Whenever user modified, updated Dark Reader's default text color and background color.Update the white flash style, whenever Dark Reader's default settings gets modified. ![]() So when it switches to the real Dark Reader theme, it's as close as it can get to the real standard of color contrast adjustment when designing / inverting webpages to Dark Mode theme.The default background stays dark grey.Make the stroke borders, white fills or elements, fill with a lighter grey color instead.So what if, since that white flash implementation can't access the default webpage settings of Dark Reader, I suggest either of these implementation : It seems that the white flash implementation, looks like an invert color / high contrast accessibility filter on the browser? Is it? But I will suggest an implementation UX suggestion. I don't know how is this implemented right now on Dark Reader. Not an engineer or developer, just a UX designer. Much better if we'll have customization to the time of the transition animation too. It should transition and render the webpage smoothly by a 1.5 seconds fade to Dark Mode rendering. Detects that it should render this webpage to Dark Mode, because it doesn't have native setting about it.Detects that it's time to go Dark again by set time (sunset).It it's set to auto or timed setting (sunset or sunrise time) if Dark Reader : Dark Reader version: Version 5 Preview (4.9.22).Here is the screen capture of the problem : You'll see the webpage renders in an inverted way, before it goes back to normal (Light) only for like 5 seconds. And not even hog the performance of the browser. If the extension is set off, and it's set to "Off" or even "Auto" (even if it's still not the time, by Chrome startup it should never renders inverted to Dark Mode webpage under any circumstances. Left an article or webpage to show up on Chrome when it starts up again.Go to Chrome "Settings" > On Startup > Check "Continue where you left off".It's an unpleasant webpage experience Steps to reproduce And it's not even the same settings as the Dark Reader. Upon every Chrome startup, even when the extension isn't set as "On", the webpage that shows up renders invertedly. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |